majors, minors, dota 2, 2018, schedule

Majors and Minors: Patching Dota 2’s tournament system

Valve unveils a new tournament structure at TI7

This upcoming season of Dota is going to be unlike any other. This is thanks to a heavy commitment from Valve in the creation of a series of Majors and Minors. A new structure will help propel Dota 2 to the next level of mainstream esports.

Get ready for a lot of Dota

A plan that features 22 organized tournaments of 11 Majors and 11 Minors was announced in Seattle this year. Minors will have a minimum prize-pool of $150,000 USD and the minimum for Majors will be $500,000 USD. These prize pools will then be matched by Valve, but not organized by them. An interesting move by Valve that also makes a lot of sense. By directly contributing resources to the prize-pool Valve is able to heighten the prestige of these tournaments. At the same time, they are placing trust into third-party organizers like DreamHack, BeyondTheSummit and Perfect World to run the events.

These organizers have shown the ability to produce top-notch events and will take a lot of pressure off of Valve and their event production. Valve events have consistently been criticized for their production due to hiccups along the way. Also, this removes the stigma surrounding “Valve Events” being more important than other large tournaments.

Now tournaments are clearly defined as Majors and Minors that contain a brand new point system. Most important is that these points will be the sole factor in obtaining an invite to next year’s International. No more arbitrary invites based on what sometimes felt like complete randomness. Points are given based on a tournament’s prize pool and the timing of the event. Events closer to the International will be worth more points and could provide for some interesting surges by teams late in the season.

An interesting detail to note is that points will be distributed to individual players before being added to a team. While only the points of the top three player point values will be applied to the team value. Roster locks will still exist, but Valve has stated that players will carry points between teams. How will this affect upcoming roster shuffles? Will teams be more inclined to keep a roster together through the season? Could this make dropping players even easier? The bottom line is we don’t know. Keep an eye on this player-based point system as it could shape the scene in new ways this season.

Majors and Minors provide structure to the scene

A season of Dota 2 can be hectic. Months can go by with tier one tournaments happening every weekend, or even simultaneously. Other times can feel void of competitive games. The Majors and Minors system will combat that with a set schedule for the tournaments that is already in place.

dota 2, majors, minors, schedule, 2018,

(Twitter)

This tweet from Team Secret’s Director of Operation, Cyborgmatt, shows a detailed schedule. Something that is already being appreciated by players. In a Reddit interview a few of EG’s players let us know their initial thoughts on Valve’s new system:

“The best thing they did about that is that they laid out a schedule for us, so we’re able to set up bootcamps way ahead of time, so I think that is really important for us.” – Arteezy

 “…If there is an event happening every single week you know, how special does it become? So there’s a couple things that we kind of have to watch out for. It should lead to more money and more stuff coming into Dota, which is good” – Universe

“…it’s pretty nice for the scene I guess, because all of the tier 2 or tier 3 teams are going to have more opportunities to play in tournaments and show themselves.” – Sumail

Dota is a game that is constantly changing. Now the professional scene is seeing a large shift in its structure. The effects will be interesting to see in the upcoming year. Undoubtedly changing the landscape of the competitive Dota 2 scene in ways we can’t foresee. What we do know is that it will be fun to watch!

You can ‘Like’ The Game Haus on Facebook and ‘Follow’ us on Twitter for more sports and esports articles from other great TGH writers along with Eli!

You can follow Eli here – https://twitter.com/E_Sherman58

To continue enjoying great content from your favorite writers, please contribute to our Patreon account! Every little bit counts. We greatly appreciate all of your amazing support! #TGHPatreon

 

The disproportion of eSports: Lots of fans, but not a lot of the economic picture

To say that eSports is growing at an exponential level isn’t all that crazy of a statement. It seems that every year, each split of the LCS, each Major in CSGO, every International we find ourselves saying the same things: “this is it, this is the most competitive it’s ever been, this is going to be bigger and better than ever.” Rarely does it seem to disappoint, whether it be huge moneyed investors buying into the LCS, or bigger prize pools for the Majors in CS:GO or another record high level for the International, eSports seems to keep compounding on itself and getting bigger. But what we’ll be looking at here is whether this impact is really all that big compared to traditional sports. Sadly, according to a report published by Deloitte Global, while eSports is growing well, it seems to both be much smaller (economically) than it should be and much smaller compared to traditional sports than eSports enthusiasts want to admit.

ESL-One-Cologne-Post-Event-Header

While rather materialistic, one way to legitimize eSports is to have it compete economically with traditional sports, that is, for it make as much money as sports and have more fans. While it really depends on who you ask, some say eSports is here to stay and to grow exponentially while others think it just a flash in the pan. I believe that eSports is here to stay and will grow greatly in the years to come. But this will not come without massive changes to eSports across the board, and serious commitments from not only the developers of these games, but also of non-gaming industry’s perception of it. This is part one of a three part series I will be running on eSports future growth and problems that impede it, where we will be focusing on trying to understand what the current problem is with eSports, namely, that it’s fan size doesn’t translate into what it’s perceived economic impact should be.

We will be using the recently published study by financial and business firm Deloitte Global as the basis for this article. There are a lot of figures thrown around in the eSports scene, of its economic growth being in the big ol’ billions of dollars to a measly couple hundred million. However, “Deloitte Global predicts that eSports will generate global revenues of $500 million in 2016, up 25 percent from about $400 million in 2015, and will likely have an audience of regular and occasional viewers of close to 150 million people.” (Deloitte Global.) 100 Million growth is pretty good, but the report also says that this is still a relatively small growth, given how young the scene is. It’s a bigger growth than traditional sports, but those have largely already established themselves, and growth can be slower in those kind of situations. ESports, it appears to say, seems to be lagging behind what it should be at.

2015 saw some of the biggest eSports Tournaments to date. Courtesy of Forbes,

2015 saw some of the biggest eSports Tournaments to date. Courtesy of Forbes,

But 150 Million people is a lot! Even by sports standards, that’s pretty huge. Surely, then, eSports must be in some way comparable to some of the big boys, right? Well, not really. 500 Million sure sounds like a lot, but compared to the other sports’ economic impact, it’s quite small. The ‘smallest’ sport given as an example, the NHL, weighs in as a lightweight at only 4 Billion. That’s 8 times the amount of eSports, even all eSports combined. The NHL only represents hockey in North America. What is sadly lacking in the report, too, is the amount of economic impact of each individual eSport, as this could be useful data when evaluating ‘who is doing it right.’ In contrast to the highest level, in European Football Leagues, eSports doesn’t even fit to scale, as Football is bringing 30 Billion. I don’t even want to calculate the difference there folks. But, of course, a lot of this shouldn’t surprise us. These leagues have been in formation for decades, sometimes even centuries, and the sports themselves have been in existence even longer (thinking European Football here.) But remember, even the growth rate of eSports in contrast to these bigger, older leagues doesn’t seem to add up to Deloitte.

The International keeps getting bigger and bigger.

The International keeps getting bigger and bigger.

In the words of the report itself, eSports is gaining on traditional sports, but, “That may be true, when measured by audience size for an individual event, but in dollar terms, eSports is not yet playing in the big leagues.” So what is going on here? Well, there obviously seems to be some form of a gap between the fan growth and dedication and the actual monetary position eSports finds itself in. Why is this the case then? Well, my educated guess here is that big(er) money advertisements, sponsors, merchandise (!!) haven’t quite kept up with the demand. 150 Million people is a lot of viewers, but these are viewers that are scattered, and I believe that a lot of big money players are still waiting to see whether this is a fire that’ll last or just be a flash in the pan. But right now, eSports seems to be lagging behind where it should be based on this study.

To highlight some of the interesting contrasts between eSports and traditional sports, we’ll highlight some of the biggest expansion/acquisition news between these two: the NHL’s expansion bids and Splyce’s released acquisition figures for Dignitas EU’s team. Fans of the scene will remember when Splyce made headlines by acquiring their EU LCS team for 1 Million dollars. That was huge, those numbers just didn’t seem normal, the scene was shocked. Now, the NHL is taking bids for expansion of their league, and one of the top contenders is the new (old?) Quebec Nordiques. We’ll not get into the details of this process, but essentially they have to prove themselves to be financially stable to enter the biggest hockey league in the world. How much does this cost? Well, the application process costs a whopping 10 Million dollars. 2 Million of that is non-refundable. So, the non-refundable portion is double the Splyce acquisition, with the overall cost being five times higher. And that isn’t even including all the other costs of doing this venture, like building a stadium for the team! In contrast, Splyce looks like a small drop in a very big pond.

Does this mean eSports is doomed to be forever small fish in a big pond? I don’t think so. But it’s important that the industry starts to consider itself seriously, that is, starts to look to model itself in ways off of traditional sports. In other words, eSports as a whole desperately needs to look within itself, to reflect and attempt to understand the barriers it is experiencing. The bigger the scene gets, the better it is for everyone involved, from bigger player salaries (or salaries being given at all,) to management positions, proper infrastructure and increased fan engagement. We’ve seen increased ‘sportisms’ popping up in eSports already. Prime Time League, a kind of ‘talk show’ of the LCS, fantasy leagues, increased support staff within eSports organizations are all things that are pointing towards eSports maturation, and not simply its growth. Sure, according to the report, there is a study that predicts eSports will have as many viewers as the NFL. Heck, even ESPN, whose slightly antiquated interactions with eSports need little introduction, has opened up an eSports division. The problem that is facing eSports now is not how best to grow it, but how best to mature it into a respectable enterprise. In my next two parts I will go into how I believe eSports can go about this, namely by moving towards a more franchise-sensitive environment and the consideration of Leagues as opposed to Major tournament formats.